Turkish vs Iranian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Iranian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Iranians
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Iranian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,583,039 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Iranian |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 20.9% | 22.1% |
| Range | 18.0% | 20.3% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 7.8% |
| Median | 7.8% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Iranians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Czech (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |