Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Chilean
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Chileans
31.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,610,464 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684 and weighted average of 31.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,368,720 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 110.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
Minimum | 7.9% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 63.9% |
Range | 92.1% | 63.1% |
Mean | 50.7% | 16.9% |
Median | 43.1% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.6% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.9% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.9% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 13.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Puerto Rican (32.8%, a difference of 4.1%), Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and Pima (29.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Belarus (15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (15.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from France (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (15.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Sri Lankans | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Finns | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 96.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
British | 96.2 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | France | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Chileans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |