Thai vs Samoan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Thai
Samoan
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Thais
Samoans
11.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Samoan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,293,416 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.611 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,909,678 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 34.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Samoan |
Minimum | 0.37% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 21.1% | 50.0% |
Range | 20.7% | 48.3% |
Mean | 7.2% | 16.3% |
Median | 6.4% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 19.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 10.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Thais by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 4.9%), Filipino (11.1%, a difference of 5.1%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Peru (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.7%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Venezuelan (15.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.6% |
Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Slavs | 84.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |