Soviet Union vs Pima Family Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Pima
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Pima
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Pima Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,531,194 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 120.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.36% | 7.2% |
| Maximum | 18.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 18.0% | 92.8% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 29.5% |
| Median | 6.2% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 34.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 22.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (18.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 5.1%), Lumbee (17.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and Pueblo (17.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |