South American vs Pueblo Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Pueblo
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Pueblo
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Pueblo Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,546,041 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215 and weighted average of 28.6%, a difference of 42.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Pueblo |
Minimum | 9.4% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.3% | 97.1% |
Mean | 20.2% | 35.5% |
Median | 19.5% | 32.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 23.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 46.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 17.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |