South American Indian vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Chippewa
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,904,356 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 35.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Chippewa |
Minimum | 5.4% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
Range | 94.6% | 68.3% |
Mean | 20.7% | 26.4% |
Median | 12.5% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.0% | 30.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.6% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Ireland (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |