Sioux vs Cajun Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sioux
Cajun
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sioux
Cajuns
31.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Cajun Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,047,098 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 31.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,582,163 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 30.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Cajun |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.9% | 93.2% |
| Mean | 49.1% | 40.8% |
| Median | 43.3% | 39.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.7% | 29.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.9% | 50.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 35.2% | 21.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.8% | 16.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.7% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Cajuns by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 2.8%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.81%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 3.3%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |