Samoan vs Basque Male Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Basque
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Basques
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
74.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Basque Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,058,260 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,709,169 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.36%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Basque |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 37.9% | 60.5% |
| Range | 37.3% | 59.0% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 13.3% |
| Median | 10.0% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Basques by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |