Pakistani vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Pakistani
South African
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Pakistanis
South Africans
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs South African Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,364,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,612,100 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.20%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | South African |
Minimum | 4.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 50.7% |
Range | 95.7% | 48.4% |
Mean | 22.3% | 13.2% |
Median | 15.8% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and South Africans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Norway (15.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Carpatho Rusyn (14.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |