Native Hawaiian vs Portuguese Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Portuguese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Portuguese
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Portuguese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,880,799 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,939,658 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.020%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Portuguese |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 30.7% | 36.0% |
Range | 28.0% | 34.3% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.7% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Portuguese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |