Native Hawaiian vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Mongolian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Mongolians
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,771,814 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 61.4% | 47.1% |
| Range | 59.3% | 43.6% |
| Mean | 22.5% | 19.9% |
| Median | 20.0% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |