Marshallese vs Tohono O'odham Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Tohono O'odham
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Tohono O'odham
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Tohono O'odham Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,469,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,748,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 31.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.1% | 88.1% |
| Mean | 38.6% | 41.3% |
| Median | 23.3% | 34.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 60.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.7% | 26.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 25.6% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Tohono O'odham by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.78%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Creek (16.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Apache (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Pueblo (21.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |