Malaysian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Nicaragua
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,653,491 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,038,180 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.85%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 55.6% |
| Range | 74.0% | 55.1% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 14.5% |
| Median | 13.8% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Nicaragua by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Yugoslavian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (12.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ecuadorian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |