Lumbee vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
23.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 23.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,906,284 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 21.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Immigrants from Dominican Republic |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 65.5% | 39.5% |
Range | 63.6% | 39.1% |
Mean | 28.4% | 21.9% |
Median | 28.6% | 21.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 25.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Immigrants from Dominican Republic by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Apache (19.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 0.76%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Houma (20.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |