Liberian vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Liberian
Scottish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Liberians
Scottish
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Scottish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,670,688 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 544,607,690 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 29.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Scottish |
Minimum | 0.32% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.7% | 97.9% |
Mean | 21.9% | 38.1% |
Median | 19.7% | 25.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 52.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 37.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 30.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 30.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |