Latvian vs Thai Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Thai
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Latvians
Thais
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Thai Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,902,894 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,747,555 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.513 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 13.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Thai |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 21.0% |
Range | 98.9% | 20.0% |
Mean | 18.4% | 7.3% |
Median | 11.8% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 9.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Thais by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Indian (Asian) (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (13.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Okinawan (13.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 5.0%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 5.8%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |