Latvian vs Belizean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Belizean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Latvians
Belizeans
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Belizean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,091,398 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,559,889 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.719 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 49.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Belizean |
Minimum | 1.2% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.8% | 95.4% |
Mean | 20.0% | 23.9% |
Median | 14.5% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.8% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.6% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Asian (13.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Comanche (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Central American (20.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |