Jordanian vs Immigrants from Canada Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from Canada
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from Canada
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Canada Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,964,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.46%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from Canada |
Minimum | 2.9% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 39.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.8% | 96.5% |
Mean | 11.8% | 26.2% |
Median | 10.9% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 17.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 24.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Canada by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |