Italian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Italians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,117,445 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,664,539 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 4.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 63.0% | 18.0% |
Range | 60.7% | 17.6% |
Mean | 9.9% | 7.3% |
Median | 7.8% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 0.87%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |