Israeli vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Israelis
Chickasaw
12.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
41.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,355,053 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 26.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 67.9% |
| Range | 51.7% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 18.0% | 25.6% |
| Median | 13.0% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Switzerland (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from North America (12.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Panamanian (12.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Canada (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Moroccan (12.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Danes | 51.4 /100 | #172 | Average 12.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 50.9 /100 | #173 | Average 12.8% |
| Costa Ricans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 12.8% |
| Croatians | 48.9 /100 | #175 | Average 12.8% |
| Syrians | 48.4 /100 | #176 | Average 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 44.8 /100 | #177 | Average 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 43.1 /100 | #178 | Average 12.8% |
| Israelis | 41.0 /100 | #179 | Average 12.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 37.7 /100 | #180 | Fair 12.9% |
| Panamanians | 37.6 /100 | #181 | Fair 12.9% |
| Moroccans | 36.8 /100 | #182 | Fair 12.9% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 33.0 /100 | #183 | Fair 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 32.5 /100 | #184 | Fair 12.9% |
| Norwegians | 32.0 /100 | #185 | Fair 12.9% |
| Nigerians | 31.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |