Indian (Asian) vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Okinawan
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Okinawans
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,755,823 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,367,839 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Okinawan |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 36.4% | 37.9% |
Range | 35.6% | 37.3% |
Mean | 11.4% | 11.5% |
Median | 10.6% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 15.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Okinawans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Bolivia (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |