Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs British Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
British
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
British
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs British Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,938,105 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | British |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 19.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 16.7% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 16.2% |
| Median | 9.3% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and British by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |