Immigrants from Uganda vs Marshallese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Marshallese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Marshallese
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
28.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Marshallese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,969,010 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 4.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Marshallese |
Minimum | 2.1% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 39.4% | 21.1% |
Range | 37.3% | 14.2% |
Mean | 14.4% | 14.6% |
Median | 12.9% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Marshallese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.010%), South American Indian (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |