Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Ukraine Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Immigrants from Ukraine
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Immigrants from Ukraine
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Ukraine Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,940,623 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,587,294 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Immigrants from Ukraine |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 37.0% | 40.0% |
| Range | 33.3% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 13.9% |
| Median | 9.8% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Ukraine by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.30%), French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |