Immigrants from Turkey vs Chinese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Chinese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Chinese
15.3%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Chinese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,600,036 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.51%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 56.5% | 85.0% |
Range | 53.2% | 84.1% |
Mean | 22.7% | 19.0% |
Median | 17.3% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.1% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.8% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.1% | 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Chinese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Maltese (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (15.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Japanese | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Mongolians | 99.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Kenyans | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |