Immigrants from Thailand vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
White/Caucasian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Whites/Caucasians
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
9.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,654,872 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.883 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 10.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 48.3% | 30.1% |
Range | 46.9% | 23.8% |
Mean | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Median | 11.9% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Malaysian (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.54%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |