Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Immigrants from China
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,658,821 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.42% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 58.8% | 42.3% |
Range | 58.4% | 41.4% |
Mean | 16.1% | 12.6% |
Median | 11.5% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Luxembourger (13.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Lithuanian (14.0%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |