Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Filipino Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Filipino
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Filipinos
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Filipino Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,664,539 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,160,394 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.87%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Filipino |
Minimum | 0.44% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 18.0% | 19.2% |
Range | 17.6% | 17.6% |
Mean | 7.3% | 8.1% |
Median | 7.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.2% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Filipinos by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |