Immigrants from Panama vs Japanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Japanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Japanese
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Japanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,060,032 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 0.31%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Japanese |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 30.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 27.5% | 95.9% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 21.0% |
| Median | 13.7% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama and Japanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |