Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,657,809 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,787,777 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 20.5%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Northern Africa	Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Minimum	6.2%	3.9%
Maximum	78.6%	100.0%
Range	72.3%	96.1%
Mean	22.9%	21.4%
Median	16.8%	18.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.8%	14.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	24.4%	24.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.6%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.9%	14.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.7%	14.3%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are French (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Chile	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%
Syrians	76.7 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Fiji	76.1 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Colombians	76.1 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Slovaks	75.2 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
French	72.8 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	72.0 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
French Canadians	68.7 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	68.4 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	67.8 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
South Americans	67.2 /100 \| #166	Good 16.1%
Uruguayans	64.7 /100 \| #167	Good 16.2%
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Potawatomi	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.2%
Cape Verdeans	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%