Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Alaskan Athabascan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Alaskan Athabascans
18.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,971,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,659,111 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 2.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 3.3% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.7% | 99.2% |
Mean | 19.1% | 38.6% |
Median | 18.0% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 60.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 45.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 31.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 30.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua and Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cuba (18.8%, a difference of 0.22%), American (18.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.87%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Osage (18.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |