Immigrants from Morocco vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
Luxembourger
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Morocco
Luxembourgers
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco vs Luxembourger Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,779,990 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 4.1% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 43.8% | 52.1% |
Range | 39.6% | 41.9% |
Mean | 21.0% | 21.8% |
Median | 18.9% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco and Luxembourgers by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |