Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Tsimshian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Tsimshian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Tsimshian
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Tsimshian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,471,628 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 15.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.57% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 22.7% |
Range | 16.1% | 18.9% |
Mean | 8.8% | 9.9% |
Median | 9.8% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |