Immigrants from Kuwait vs Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,275,840 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,443,448 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 2.1%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Kuwait	Tlingit-Haida
Minimum	4.6%	0.92%
Maximum	50.7%	37.8%
Range	46.1%	36.9%
Mean	17.1%	18.1%
Median	14.3%	18.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.1%	10.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.1%	25.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.0%	14.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.0%	10.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.9%	9.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kuwait and Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Spain (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Czechoslovakians	92.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.3%
Palestinians	91.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Canadians	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Brazil	90.3 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	90.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	88.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.5%
Welsh	88.3 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.5%
Peruvians	88.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Portuguese	87.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Icelanders	87.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants \| Spain	87.1 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	86.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.6%
Albanians	86.5 /100 \| #139	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 15.6%
Slavs	84.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	84.1 /100 \| #142	Excellent 15.7%