Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Russian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Russian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Russians
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Russian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,546,628 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 509,085,697 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 2.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Russian |
Minimum | 0.35% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 45.5% |
Range | 13.5% | 42.3% |
Mean | 6.2% | 10.6% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Russians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |