Immigrants from Guatemala vs Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Welsh
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Welsh
21.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Welsh Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 372,986,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,157,850 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 39.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Welsh |
Minimum | 3.5% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 69.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 65.5% | 90.5% |
Mean | 30.9% | 35.5% |
Median | 28.1% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.1% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.9% | 56.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 39.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 29.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 28.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Ute (21.8%, a difference of 0.27%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.55%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |