Immigrants from Fiji vs Basque Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Basque
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Fiji
Basques
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
71.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji vs Basque Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,754,712 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji | Basque |
| Minimum | 8.9% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 35.4% |
| Range | 12.2% | 34.4% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 12.9% |
| Median | 12.9% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji and Basques by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |