Immigrants from England vs South American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
South American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
South Americans
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs South American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 384,642,935 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.788 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.89%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | South American |
Minimum | 17.4% | 9.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 46.7% |
Range | 82.6% | 37.3% |
Mean | 39.8% | 20.2% |
Median | 32.0% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.2% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.2% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.0% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.5% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and South Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |