Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Denmark Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from Denmark
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from Denmark
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Denmark Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,497,975 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,190,305 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 20.5%, a difference of 3.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from Denmark |
Minimum | 2.6% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.7% | 94.7% |
Mean | 21.1% | 30.0% |
Median | 20.7% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 17.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 35.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 24.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |