Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Salvadoran
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Salvadorans
14.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Salvadoran Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,182,579 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,267,289 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 0.31%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Salvadoran |
Minimum | 0.43% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 35.7% |
Range | 30.3% | 33.9% |
Mean | 14.1% | 14.4% |
Median | 13.9% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Salvadorans by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bhutanese (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and Bhutanese (15.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 15.0% |