Immigrants from China vs Korean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Korean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Koreans
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Korean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,455,609 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 4.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Korean |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 24.4% | 56.1% |
Range | 23.3% | 54.0% |
Mean | 12.0% | 13.2% |
Median | 11.4% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Koreans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Scotland (14.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bolivia (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Australia (14.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |