Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Belarus
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Belarus
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,164,106 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.79%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.12% |
| Maximum | 24.3% | 26.1% |
| Range | 22.4% | 25.9% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 10.6% |
| Median | 9.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Belarus by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |