Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from South Central Asia
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,435,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,025,257 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 23.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 15.0% | 15.8% |
Range | 14.0% | 15.2% |
Mean | 9.0% | 5.4% |
Median | 9.2% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |