Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
7.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,808,313 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,180,585 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 19.0% |
Range | 28.6% | 18.3% |
Mean | 8.9% | 7.4% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Bolivian (7.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Scandinavian (7.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |