Immigrants from Australia vs Blackfeet Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Blackfeet
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Blackfeet
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Blackfeet Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,453,715 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,344,342 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 25.1%, a difference of 29.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 3.5% | 6.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.5% | 93.9% |
Mean | 28.1% | 43.8% |
Median | 21.4% | 37.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 26.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 56.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 29.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 23.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Shoshone (25.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |