Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Zimbabweans
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
50.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,630,543 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 9.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 7.2% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 31.3% | 21.7% |
Range | 24.1% | 19.5% |
Mean | 14.8% | 10.3% |
Median | 12.4% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Celtic (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |