Hmong vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Hmong
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Hmong
Luxembourgers
17.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,646,023 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 22.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.61% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 45.4% | 33.3% |
Range | 44.8% | 32.0% |
Mean | 18.0% | 11.9% |
Median | 16.1% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Cameroon (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%), Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Panamanian (17.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and Iraqi (17.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |