Greek vs Immigrants from Lithuania Male Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Immigrants from Lithuania
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Immigrants from Lithuania
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Immigrants from Lithuania Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,993,852 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 3.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 0.65% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 95.7% | 17.6% |
| Range | 95.1% | 15.8% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 7.0% |
| Median | 8.4% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.7% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Immigrants from Lithuania by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |