Estonian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Estonian
Czech
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Estonians
Czechs
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,015,840 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,185,036 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Estonian | Czech |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 36.4% |
Range | 98.6% | 35.4% |
Mean | 21.6% | 14.7% |
Median | 14.4% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Czechs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |