English vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
English
Slovak
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
English
Slovaks
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,761,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,555,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 4.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Slovak |
Minimum | 2.2% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 97.8% | 96.0% |
Mean | 28.6% | 26.8% |
Median | 17.0% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.5% | 21.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to English by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |